The Millward Brown Optimor BrandZ Top 100 global brands list is here again and there are some interesting findings. You can view the full report here.
The top 10 table is as follows:
BRANDZ Top 100 = The 10 most powerful global brands (value in $million) 2007:
2006 value
1. Google 66,434 37,445
2. GE (General Electric) 61,880 55,834
3. Microsoft 54,951 62,039
4. Coca Cola 44,134 41,406
5. China Mobile 41,214 39,168
6. Marlboro 39,166 38,510
7. Wal-Mart 36,880 37,567
8. Citi 33,706 31,028
9. IBM 33,572 36,084
10. Toyota 33,427 30,201
While old ‘top brands’ contenders such as Coca-Cola and Wal-Mart are still in the list, it is some of the other companies represented which tell a more interesting story. Google, a company which essentially offers its service free to consumers, has turned freedom of information into one of the biggest brand-building stories ever told.
China Mobile is also an interesting candidate. After all, is it really a strong global brand or a strong Chinese brand? Yes, it may be used by more people than any other mobile operator because China is the world’s most populous country, but can it really claim to be a top brand with such limited presence elsewhere? Or does its strength in China simply give it enough brand strength in numbers to be a player on the global brand stage?
It is also fascinating to see Toyota in there. The Japanese car manufacturer is the highest-placed of all the car brands, four places above its nearest rival BMW. Is this the sign that the American and European car-making giants are being superseded by Asian brands? Or perhaps more interesting, has Toyota’s overt commitment to environmental issues won it consumer interest (even if people don’t actually buy the hybrid model themselves)?
Let us know your views. In the meantime, if you are a Brand Strategy subscriber, you can read our columnist Alan Mitchell’s take on the results in his next column!
If you are interested in what trends Millward Brown Optimor are highlighting as the result of the research, carry on reading……
Read the rest of this entry »